Embracing Change: Leading Through Change - Essential Skills for Managers in Behavioral Health Settings

 By Beth Rutkowski, MPH, and Michael Shafer, Ph.D.

Behavioral health and recovery support professionals operate within interdisciplinary, multi-professional teams of providers. Behavioral health professionals frequently find themselves serving as site managers, team leaders, shift leads, clinical supervisors, and other middle-management positions. In these positions, behavioral health professionals are often called upon to perform tasks and functions for which their clinical training program did not provide adequate preparation. 

 

Among these roles is that of team leader. In these capacities, team leaders serve as facilitators of team development, cohesion, and action, including the implementation of new practice routines. Facilitators help others get things done. Effective team leaders work best by promoting inclusive engagement in team decision-making and team responsibilities among all members of the team.

 

The PSATTC developed and pilot tested an intensive technical assistance model designed to enhance internal change capacity within substance use disorder treatment and recovery support organizations. 


A bunch of white arrows pointing to the right, while a single red arrow in the middle points to the left.


 

For the past three years and amid the COVID-19 pandemic, 77 individuals representing 32 agencies participated in intensive training on change management facilitation and effective facilitation skills. Participating agencies launched change teams and engaged in a series of actions designed to identify and prioritize issues in need of improvement. The teams then designed and carried out a series of implementation steps while ensuring executive sponsor engagement and support. 

 

Drawing upon traditions of group work and systems theories, while integrating elements of process improvement, including NIATx, the Organizational Process Improvement Initiative (OPII) was designed to develop internal change facilitator(s) and internal change capacity within organizational units or teams, as opposed to deploying an external facilitator/consultant technical assistance model. In this approach and as we emphasized to our participants, we were "change agnostic." In contrast to more narrowly focused process improvement or EBP implementation-focused technical assistance approaches, the OPII provided teams with the skills and a structure for launching and sustaining changes they had prioritized with executive leadership endorsement.

 

The beginnings of the COVID-19 pandemic occurred a month after launching our second cohort as 37 individuals completed three days of in-person training on the OPII and change facilitation. Learning lessons from our first-cohort experiences, teams left with PSATTC faculty site visits scheduled within the next 45 days to ensure the launch of local agency change teams and the beginning of a 9-12-month structured change plan process.

 

Remarkably, most of these participating agencies ultimately returned to their change efforts and engaged in the OPII change model to varying degrees of success. 


For the next two years, our PSATTC team made radical changes in our approach and the platforms and tools available to us to provide intensive technical assistance.

 

As we approached the launch of our third cohort, we did so with a recognition that everything that the PSATTC provided had to be delivered virtually and that every agency participating in the cohort would be doing their local change facilitation work virtually, as well. We threw out our tried and true "three-day, in-person, intensive training workshop," and replaced it with a five-week, eight-session, 21-hour virtual training Academy. We planned for local agency change teams to be convening virtually, with some agency personnel working from home while others were in the clinic. We required participating agencies to purchase (a cost of ~$200) and utilize MIRO, a virtual collaboration application, for local change team meetings. We utilized MIRO as our instructional delivery platform and pre-populated numerous pages and templates for use during the training that change facilitators could copy and use with their team.

 

The pandemic served as a major innovation disruptor to our team, causing us to pivot to the new realities that COVID-19 brought, not only in how we engaged with agencies to deliver intensive technical assistance but also how change was occurring within these agencies and the types of changes that they prioritized to address. Recognizing that the participating agency-based teams, like our PSATTC team, were living and breathing Zoom, we came up with a whole suite of no- and low-cost options for facilitating team meetings virtually. Jamboards, Mentimeter, Zoom polling, Google Docs, and Sheets replaced Flipcharts, masking tape, and Sharpies.

 

We discovered as a team and with our participating agencies that these virtual-mediated team facilitation tools provided, in many instances, more effective, inclusive, and efficient platforms than traditional and in-person devices.

 

As we emerge from the pandemic, we find ourselves challenged with integrating our newfound tools and experiences in virtually mediated technical assistance with some of our more traditional tools and devices. Supplementing our technical assistance “toolbox” with Jamboards and Zoom are perfect compliments to flipcharts and Sharpies in this post-COVID hybrid world within which we live!

 

Beth Rutkowski, MPH, has been associated with UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs (ISAP) since December 2000, and currently serves as the Director of Training and Co-Director of the SAMHSA-funded Pacific Southwest Addiction Technology Training Center. In addition, she organizes and conducts conferences and trainings throughout the Pacific Southwest region, and has co-authored and edited several peer-reviewed research articles, book chapters, special issues, and technical reports on a variety of topics related to the treatment of substance use disorders.

 

Michael S. Shafer, Ph.D., is a Professor of Social Work at Arizona State University. Dr. Shafer has been associated with the Pacific Southwest ATTC for over 20 years, in addition to serving as Principal Investigator on multiple federally- and state-funded studies of implementation and inter-organizational collaboration. Shafer has published extensively in peer-reviewed journals, book chapters, asynchronous learning modules, and curricula.

NIATx Model Featured in Newly Released Classroom WISE Training Discussion Guide

By: Kristina Spannbauer, Great Lakes ATTC, MHTTC, and PTTC Communications Specialist

The Great Lakes Mental Health Technology Transfer Center School-based Supplement (SB-MHTTC) recently published a companion discussion guide for the Classroom WISE training program. Classroom WISE is a free, self-paced online course for educators and school staff that focuses on increasing mental health literacy in schools and developing robust and sustainable supports for students experiencing mental health distress and adversity. The Classroom WISE Discussion Guide is a supplemental training resource based on NIATx principles. The guide offers users a framework for integrating the Classroom WISE strategies in schools by applying evidence-based process improvement methods such as the nominal group technique (NGT) and PDSA (Plan, Do, Study, Act) rapid-cycle testing.

CLassroom WISE instructional material cover.
Recently, the Great Lakes SB-MHTTC also utilized the NIATx model as part of a school-based intensive technical assistance program (ITA) aimed at improving youth suicide prevention efforts. The educators who participated in the ITA reported how valuable NIATx was to the success of their initiatives. This positive feedback was, in part, the inspiration for creating the Classroom WISE Discussion Guide. The Great Lakes SB-MHTTC team recognized a unique opportunity to pair the NIATx model with the Classroom WISE curriculum to enhance the outcomes of the Classroom WISE strategies for educators and their students. 

The blending of both models provides more specific instruction on the steps required to successfully implement the training and how to measure change accurately and effectively over time as users complete the Classroom WISE training modules.

The NIATx model relies on implementation science and uses evidence-based practices to assist organizations through times of change in a collaborative manner that supports the organization’s goals and strengthens its infrastructure throughout the process. Furthermore, NIATx offers guidance on creating and facilitating work groups using nominal group technique—an approach emphasizing the equal representation of ideas, prioritizing organizational needs, and using data-driven decision-making to effect positive change. The inclusivity and equitable participation promoted by the nominal group technique is a vital component of successful process improvement as it explicitly includes the thoughts and opinions of everyone in the group—from the “executive” or those in leadership to the on-the-ground workers.

The Classroom WISE Discussion Guide is available for download on the Great Lakes Mental Health Technology Transfer Center’s products and resources website.  

The Classroom WISE training program was developed by the Mental Health Technology Transfer Center (MHTTC) Network and the National Center for School Mental Health (NCSMH) with funding from cooperative agreements with the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA).

For more information about Classroom WISE, and to access the brand new Cultural Inclusiveness and Equity (CIE) WISE companion training series, please visit classroomwise.org.

Related Content:

Check out the June 2022 ATTC/NIATX Service Improvement Blog, “SUD and Beyond: Schools Use NIATx To Improve Youth Suicide Prevention Efforts” to read more about applying the NIATx model to school-based programs and services.

 

Embracing Change: The Fluidity of Evidence-Based SBIRT

 By Diana Padilla, CLC, CARC, CASAC-T, on behalf of Northeast & Caribbean ATTC 

The SBIRT Framework 

Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment, also referred to as SBIRT, is an evidence-based practice designed to intervene with people who are at risk of health and psychosocial consequences stemming from their risky levels of alcohol consumption and/or other substance use.

As a comprehensive, integrated, public health approach, the components of the SBIRT model include screening for substance use, and when warranted, a brief intervention (dialogue using Motivational Interviewing core communication skills) and referral to treatment. An array of non-substance use disorder treatment settings provide opportunities to identify and reduce harmful levels of consumption with people who generally don’t meet the criteria of a substance use disorder but are experiencing adverse effects as a result.  

Adapting SBIRT

The NeC-ATTC has provided technical assistance and implementation support to organizations seeking to integrate SBIRT in HIV programs, prevention and recovery support organizations, state agencies, and community peer-based initiatives. As such, SBIRT has been adapted to meet specific community needs. 

Based on the focus of programs and target populations, we have helped providers learn to use SBIRT to screen and address problematic behavior related to specific health issues. Creating an atmosphere that is physically and cognitively conducive to helping people feel comfortable and likely to engage is key. Validated screening tools specific to the identified health concern are used as required within the context of the SBIRT model.

A brief intervention dialogue using motivational interviewing core communication skills allows for a person-centered interaction that can help clients consider options for addressing behavior that may impede them from meeting their identified goals. A brief intervention that is effectively delivered helps to build receptivity to a referral for further assessment and possible treatment.  We have found that the components of the SBIRT intervention can be adapted to fit a variety of specific health issues beyond just problematic substance use without compromising the fidelity of the evidence-based practice.  

Expanded Application of SBIRT: Case Study
A black person holds their head in their hands and appears visibly depressed.

While major depression and general anxiety disorders are the most diagnosed mental health disorders in the US, they are severely underdiagnosed among the Black community. 

Although socio-economic, cultural, and contextual factors contribute to health disparities for people of color, stigmatizing beliefs about mental illness lend to the underdiagnosing of these disorders for African American populations. As such, the SBIRT model has the potential to enhance the identification of mental health issues within diverse communities.  

Currently, the NeC-ATTC is providing technical assistance support to Dr. Sidney Hankerson, Columbia University’s pilot study, “Depression Screening in Black Churches,” a clinical trial testing the viability of using SBIRT with African Americans versus the traditional mental health referral process. 

The study recognizes that African Americans have the highest rates of church attendance among all racial/ethnic groups in the U.S., with over 60% attending church several times per month. Approximately 72% of African Americans with serious personal problems, including depression, seek help in Black churches.

The pilot program recruits members of church congregations, (30 churches involved in the study) to train as Community Health Workers (CHWs) in the facilitation of SBIRT. It is hypothesized that using SBIRT may bridge the gap between depression screening and access to treatment. Part of the cultural framework for initiating SBIRT includes CHWs representative of the diverse communities who also attend the churches where the study is piloted. This offers both the faith-based and racial-cultural affiliations that can help increase the likelihood that community members will participate in the study, get screened, and possibly link to mental health care.  

Cultural Benefits of SBIRT Adaptation 

With health care disparities reported as extremely high amongst diverse populations, the flexibility of SBIRT model provides opportunities to reach diverse populations who struggle with conditions that may not necessarily be identified and treated in traditional health care processes.  

The Depression Screening in Black Churches is an ongoing study. But the hope is that data will show that SBIRT can help increase access to care for African American communities burdened with a high prevalence of depression and possibly other mental illnesses.  If so, it can open the door for more studies as well as training for clinicians and providers to help meet the needs of culturally diverse individuals and advance equity in care.

Depression Screening in Black Churches

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04524767

Sponsor:

Columbia University

Collaborator:

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Information provided by (Responsible Party):

Sidney Hankerson, Columbia University

Author bio: Diana Padilla, is a Research Project Manager, at the New York State Psychiatric Institute, Division of Substance Use Disorders, Columbia University Medical Center. She is a curriculum developer and senior trainer for the Northeast & Caribbean Addiction and Prevention Technology Transfer Centers. She is certified by the New York State Office of Addiction Services and Supports (NYS OASAS) as an SBIRT trainer.