December 6, 2013
Kimberly Johnson, MS Ed, MBA
Deputy Director, NIATx
Co-Director, ATTC Network Coordinating Office
Kimberly Johnson, MS Ed, MBA
Deputy Director, NIATx
Co-Director, ATTC Network Coordinating Office
If there's one thing that we seem to be constantly fussing
about in addiction treatment, it’s integration.
When I first started in the field, we were still resisting the integration of alcohol and drug abuse treatment. Younger people may be saying “What? That seems silly!” But it was a big debate at the time. The drug treatment people felt they would be taken over by the bigger, more established alcohol treatment system, and the alcohol treatment system wasn’t sure it wanted to deal with the drug problem.
When I first started in the field, we were still resisting the integration of alcohol and drug abuse treatment. Younger people may be saying “What? That seems silly!” But it was a big debate at the time. The drug treatment people felt they would be taken over by the bigger, more established alcohol treatment system, and the alcohol treatment system wasn’t sure it wanted to deal with the drug problem.
When I was a student, we kicked people out of treatment for
having co-occurring disorders. I think the rationale was that these clients were
too sick to focus on their addiction, or something like that. I know I never
graduated a single client during my internship because I kept learning they had
mental health problems. Toward the end, I started wishing they would be less
open with me.
So, when I became the executive director of a treatment
agency in the mid-1990s, I was very enthusiastic about trying to figure out how
to integrate mental health and substance abuse services for people with co-occurring
disorders. It was a big debate because the addiction treatment people were
worried about being taken over by the big mental health centers, and the mental
health people weren’t sure they wanted to deal with addicts.
Remember what I said earlier about integrating alcohol treatment with other drug treatment?
It was déjà vu all over again.
Now, we’re talking about integrating behavioral health (even though we are still fighting about that term) into primary care. It’s a big debate because the behavioral health providers are worried about being taken over by the big primary care systems, and the primary care systems don’t really want to deal with people with behavioral health disorders.
Remember what I said earlier about integrating alcohol treatment with other drug treatment?
It was déjà vu all over again.
Now, we’re talking about integrating behavioral health (even though we are still fighting about that term) into primary care. It’s a big debate because the behavioral health providers are worried about being taken over by the big primary care systems, and the primary care systems don’t really want to deal with people with behavioral health disorders.
What’s funny (or sad, depending on your perspective) is that
in many ways alcohol and drug treatment really do remain separate; psychiatric
disorders other than substance use disorders are still treated really
differently; and very few of us understand the interaction between mind and
body at even an elementary level.
But we have to keep trying. And I suppose we have to keep debating, not about whether to do it, but about the best way to do it. We have to debate, we have to experiment, and we have to keep trying to figure out the best ways to integrate, because we still don’t really know.
During the next year, The Bridge, the ATTC Network's quarterly e-journal, will be devoted to the topic of integration in healthcare. The discussion starts with the next issue. If you haven’t yet subscribed to The Bridge, please do. We will review the literature, debate what it tells us, and propose next steps based on where our research and discussion leads us. Join us in this debate. It will be fun.
But we have to keep trying. And I suppose we have to keep debating, not about whether to do it, but about the best way to do it. We have to debate, we have to experiment, and we have to keep trying to figure out the best ways to integrate, because we still don’t really know.
During the next year, The Bridge, the ATTC Network's quarterly e-journal, will be devoted to the topic of integration in healthcare. The discussion starts with the next issue. If you haven’t yet subscribed to The Bridge, please do. We will review the literature, debate what it tells us, and propose next steps based on where our research and discussion leads us. Join us in this debate. It will be fun.
I’m trying to imagine what the next big integration debate
will be. I’m too blinded by the current controversy to think too far ahead, but
maybe you have some ideas.
The SAMHSA-HRSA Center for Integrated Health Solutions (CIHS)
offers a wealth of resources and information dedicated to healthcare
integration. (And the images in this post are from the CIHS
website--check out their excellent infographic on the benefits of integrated care.)
Kimberly
Johnson served for seven years as the director of the Office of Substance Abuse
in Maine. She has also served as an executive director for a treatment agency,
managed intervention and prevention programs, and has worked as a child and
family therapist. She joined NIATx in 2007 to lead the ACTION Campaign, a
national initiative to increase access to and retention in treatment. She is
currently involved in projects with the ATTC Network and NIATx that focus on
increasing implementation of evidence-based practices, testing mobile health
applications, and developing distance learning programs for behavioral health
professionals.
No comments:
Post a Comment